That made sense to the working group, which will eventually make recommendations on how to improve navigation and public safety in the estuary to the towns' boards of selectmen. Everybody around this table has some experience in dredging investigations and is similarly informed by their town committees. “This group, with a couple of other people, could be the CAC,” he said. Charlie Carlson, chairman of the Orleans Dredge Advisory Committee, had another idea. The special review procedure would include a citizens advisory committee, which at first seemed it would be an entity separate from the working group. If we're still working on the MOU in October, we won't be ready for the voters in May.” Orleans Natural Resources Manager Nate Sears wanted “to be sure that what we are doing syncs with what the National Park would like to see.” Carlstrom said Seashore staff “has been in the loop on anything going on so far.” For town meeting (funding), we need to have a sense (of costs) by January. Given that federal review of the MOU might take more than a month, Galligan said he hoped “to move this as far as I can as quickly as I can. Carlstrom found two items in the draft to excise immediately: a “connotation that the National Park Service has a regulatory component relative to dredging we don't,” and a reference to the Seashore Advisory Commission, which ceased existing “a year ago and is no longer standing.” That document will be reviewed by the two town's boards and counsels as well as the National Park Service's solicitor's office. “I hope that as stakeholders we look at this as really a lot of research study and good supporting documentation.” He pushed for a specific timeline of actions in the memorandum of understanding. “There's a lot that has been accomplished,” Orleans Selectman Kevin Galligan said. WHG has also spoken with MassWildlife's Natural Heritage and Endangered Species program to coordinate a review of dewatering sites, and has met with state agencies to arrange a special review procedure that would coordinate various agency assessments of any project. A red tide cyst pilot project to determine whether the cysts would remain viable once dewatered and put in a dune for restoration will be conducted between December and April.Īn EFH (essential fish habitat) study, a biological assessment, and a review of cultural and historic aspects should be completed by the end of the month, according to Fields. Sediment coring and chemistry “came back fine for upland disposal” of dredge spoils, she said, and a shellfish sampling survey will be conducted next week with results available a few weeks later. Woods Hole Group consultant Leslie Fields reviewed scientific studies completed or in progress. Seashore Superintendent Brian Carlstrom said his agency's goal is “continued cooperation with both towns” in support of “adequate navigation and safety that may entail dredging.” Eastham is focused on getting “the data we need to make better and more informed decisions” about proceeding to the next step, said Town Administrator Jacqui Beebe. Orleans, which is paying for a battery of environmental studies of the estuary, wants to see environmental questions related to dredging resolved and a multi-jurisdictional framework for federal and state review set up before permitting begins, according to Town Administrator John Kelly. 9 at Eastham Town Hall and found ways to move forward on improving navigation and public safety in Nauset Estuary. EASTHAM - Representatives of Orleans, Eastham, and Cape Cod National Seashore parsed a draft memorandum of understanding Sept.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |